A Cruel and Angry God.

What Azena says.

That is your AC when flatfooted.

Dego is correct. They're all circumstantial.

ah I see.

When dwarf's trip, their dexterity triples cuz they just roll the fuck away.

No, you just get a +4 to your CMD.

sure that too.

So is this gonna be like most of our RPs (atleast the ones I've been a part of) except combat will be rolls or are we going to be rolling for like observations and spotting traps and all that D&D crap, too?

You'll be making a few spot checks, yes, but by and large it'll play like a regular RP since, well, there is only so much I can change given the medium with which I have to work with.

Okay, well, my lack of D&D experience is about to show, hope I did that post right

Looks fine.

So do I roll another d20? or the d10 that the wiki said to use for my greatsword?

Roll what it says to roll for your weapon.

Edit. And it is 2d6. A d10 would be if you were a small sized character.

All right, fixed it.

That is right. Good job.

Recommendation: Roll to-hit and damage at the same time. If you don't hit, whatever, if you do, the damage is already there for you to use.

...on the tabletop this is actually kind of a pain in the ass, but in this case definitely the better option. If there's a critical, you just roll more damage, so that doesn't matter.


Edit: While I'm commenting, it's really unwieldy if initiative splits us up and you have to wait for specific people to post, then we have to wait for you to do one or two enemies, then onwards like that. Either the party and the enemies each need one solid initiative, or the enemies all get one but the party gets seperate ones (so you either go before or after the enemies, and after the first round it's functionally the same as if we each have our own initiative)

If the party goes all at once they can gang up on the bad guys, if the bad guys go at once they can potentially kill off a character in one go. It might make things faster, but it would also unbalance the battle, I feel.

I agree on the rolls though, it should be done like that from now on. In real life, I find it better to just roll what I have to (because rolling 4 die seems retarded) but on this it'll help expedite the process.

So, should I roll both then?

If you're going to attack, yes. Roll for attack, and roll for damage. If it hits, we know the damage, and can move on, if it doesn't we just ignore it and move on.

Alright.

That sure didn't hit.

It might unbalance it, but it will definitely simplify/declunk it.

Besides, not like this group knows anything about cooridinating. And you can stop everyone from killing a player in one turn by..not doing that? Spread the pain.

Besides. Technically we could all delay our turns to line up and make it that way anyway.

True I guess. I suppose I'm just a bit uncomfortable with changing it at this point. If I feel it needs to be changed later I'll change it, but at this point I don't think there is that great a need for change.

When we finish the fight with the wolves three weeks from now, you might change your mind.

So what do I need to roll?

If you're going to attack you need to roll a d20 to see if you hit, then a d6 for your damage.

Should look like this:

Random number (1,20) :

9

Random number (1,6) :

2